Alyssa Milano has launched a full blown campaign against the Georgia anti-abortion laws. She is calling on women to go on a sex strike, well, at least until she’s given the right to kill babies ,even 6 weeks old babies and older ofcourse.
Here’s the tweet from Alyssa Milano.
Our reproductive rights are being erased.
Until women have legal control over our own bodies we just cannot risk pregnancy.
JOIN ME by not having sex until we get bodily autonomy back.
— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) May 11, 2019
And if you’re not too familiar with the Georgia bill, here’s is what’s in it. Just a few details to get you up to speed.
Currently in Georgia, women are allowed to undergo abortion procedures up to their 20th week of pregnancy. Starting on January 1, the bill Kemp signed generally would ban abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, which can be as early as six weeks into a pregnancy — when many women don’t yet know they’re pregnant.
“(The bill) is very simple but also very powerful: a declaration that all life has value, that all life matters, and that all life is worthy of protection,” Kemp said before signing the bill.
The legislation says that “no abortion is authorized or shall be performed if the unborn child has been determined to have a human heartbeat.” It includes some exceptions, including if the pregnancy risks the life or poses substantial and irreversible physical harm to the pregnant woman.
More of what Allysa Millano said that I will say is troubling is her hashtag on Twitter.
She used a hashtag on Twitter that says #HB481IsBad ForBusiness.
And went one further by saying “Hollywood! We should stop feeding GA economy.”
So how much of the right to kill babies is for business?
Oh wait, there’s planned parenthood that gets lots of millions of dollars just to end innocent babies lives.
And am not an expert on this topic, just trying to put in my opinion with some facts to back it up. Lots of folks having already delved into the Controversial Roe V wade argument, but here’s the truth about what is says.
Roe v. Wade, was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a fundamental “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s liberty to choose whether or not to have an abortion, while also ruling that this right is not absolute and must be balanced against the government’s interests in protecting women’s health and protecting prenatal life.
The court was clear, that the right was not absolute.
The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy: the Court ruled that during the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions; during the second trimester, abortions still could not be prohibited, but governments could “regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health”; during the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when abortion was necessary to save the life of the mother. Because the Court classified the right to choose to have an abortion as “fundamental”, the decision required courts to evaluate challenged abortion laws under the “strict scrutiny” standard, the highest level of judicial review in the United States.
Science has at least proven that life begins at conception, which I think is of more value than the trimester judgement issued by the supreme court. So why can’t we look at these issues are fix what is wrong? Why is it legal to kill a baby of let’s say 6 weeks but illegal to kill a baby of 29 weeks? Life is life no matter how old it is, place it is found.
Well, I’m not one to judge, or call you out on moral grounds, Allysa Millano. But I think if for one moment, you sit down to think about your position a little bit before you put out a barrage of tweets advocating for killing of babies, maybe you will understand that this bill is not that bad at all. There are exceptions in the bill. If the child posses a threat to the mother, there’s an exception for that. I mean, why get pregnant if all you want is to stop the baby from living? That’s cruelty at best. We have lots of ways you can have safe sex if you’re not ready. Or maybe let’s talk about reducing promiscuity in the society and say one of the lines Ben Shapiro uses alot. Which is “don’t put that thing there without the other thing on it” that’s to say, avoid sex before marriage or outside wedlock.
But if that is too difficult to do, why don’t you advocate for condoms, yea, at least it’s not very expensive… let’s save a life today, an innocent life at that.
Give these babies the chance to live, at least let them have a chance…
This is just my opinion.